Knowing the Difference between Form I-9 and E-Verify

Employers often use E-Verify and Form I-9 interchangeably. But the truth is, while they are related, they are very different processes.

Form I-9, from the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service (USCIS), is the core of E-Verify.  It is used by an employer to verify an employee’s identity and eligibility for employment in the United States. E-Verify is not to be mistaken as an electronic version of Form I-9.  E-Verify is an internet-based system that compares information from the Form I-9 to government records to confirm that an employee is authorized to work in the United States.

Although E-Verify uses information from Form I-9, there are some important differences between Form I-9 and E-Verify requirements:

Form I-9	E-Verify
Is mandatory	Is voluntary for most businesses
Does not require a Social Security number	Requires a Social Security number
Does not require a photo on identity documents (List B)	Requires a photo on identity documents (List B)
Must be used to re-verify expired employment authorization	MAY NOT be used to re-verify expired employment authorization

Therefore, E-Verify cannot be used to replace Form I-9. E-Verify is used in conjunction with Form I-9 to help employers confirm that an employee is authorized to work in the U.S.

Why would an employer utilize E-Verify?

1.     It may be a requirement if the employer is a federal contractor or conducts business in a state that requires it.

2.     Participation makes it possible to hire some foreign students doing extended Optional Practical Training in a STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, or Math) profession.

3.     E-Verify creates a presumption of an employer’s good faith compliance in the event of an I-9 audit.

4.     Many employers, especially those with large payrolls and multiple offices throughout the country, like the ease of using E-Verify and the security it provides in ensuring a legal workforce, especially when used in conjunction with an electronic I-9 system.

 Which states require employers to use E-Verify?

 There are currently 20 states that require the use of E-Verify to some extent. Click here to see which states require E-Verify and in what capacity. 

Electronic I-9 Beta

Managing the completion and storage of Form I-9 can be one of the most labor intensive parts of the on-boarding process. We are happy to announce that we are offering a solution to turn your manual, paper-based procedure into a digital, user-friendly process. We are currently allowing clients to participate in our Electronic I-9 Beta while we fine-tune the solution to better suit your needs.

The Electronic I-9 management system fulfills all U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) obligations. The digital I-9 form helps to eliminate errors for accurate completion. The form is sent by email and filled out by the employee. The employer will fill out their portion of the form and it will be automatically be stored. An option to include E-Verify is available. Tracking/auditing the entire process will be much easier when you switch to our digital option. 

Advantages include:

·         Improved accuracy when filling out Form I-9

·         Easy to audit

·         Paperless storage all in one place

·         Integrated background screening and on-boarding

·         Notification of I-9 expiration

Contact your account manager today to get additional information about our Electronic I-9 Solution, pricing, and how to join the Beta!

Not an S2Verify client? Contact us at 1 855 671 1933 to get started today!

E-Verify Update

  While it is not mandatory nationwide at this time, there has been recent legislation making E-Verify a requirement in some states. It is important, as an employer, to be aware of your state’s requirements and which businesses it applies to. Each state has a different policy.

A total of 20 states require the use of E-Verify for at least some public and/or private employers: Alabama, Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Utah, Virginia, and West Virginia.

Recent Legislation:

Georgia: The Georgia Illegal Immigration Reform and Enforcement Act of 2011 (HB 87) mandates that private employers with over 10 employees register with and use E-Verify. The mandate’s first effective date was January 1, 2012 for businesses with 500+ employees. On July 1, 2013 the requirements became effective for businesses with 10+ employees. 

North Carolina: The North Carolina General Assembly enacted HB 36 that required businesses in the state with 25 or more employees to use E-Verify on all new hires. North Carolina, much like Georgia, has been using a phased approach. HB 36 became active in October 1, 2012 for employers with 500+ employees. As of July 2013, it now applies to employers with 25+ employees.

Pennsylvania: SB 637, enacted in July 2012, requires all public works state contractors and subcontractors with contracts worth $25,000 or more to enroll and use E-Verify by January 1, 2013.

Tennessee: The Tennessee Lawful Employment Act (HB 1378) requires all employers with more than 5 employees to use E-Verify. A phased in approach was used, starting with private companies with 500+ employees in January of 2012. The Act applies to employers with 6+ employees as of January of 2013. The Act also requires employers to maintain documentation of non-employees paid directly by the employer in exchange for labor or services.

Below is a list of specifics for each state that requires the use of E-Verify for employment eligibility verification.

	State	Citation	Year Enacted	Applies to:	Penalties:
1	Alabama	HB 56 HB 658	2011 2012	All employers (phase in) Contractors and subcontractors; prime contractors not liable for subcontractor complying with E-Verify unless they know of the violation	Cancellation of state government grants or incentives and suspension or revocation of business license up to 60 days, and possible debarment from state contracts. A business license can be permanently revoke on a second offense
2	Arizona	HB 2779 HB 2745	2007 2008	All employers	Temporary AZ business license suspension for 10 days upon first offense; permanent AZ business license suspension upon second offense
3	Colorado	HB 1343 SB 139 SB 193	2006 2008 2008	State agencies, contractors	Contractors may become ineligible to receive state contracts. The Colorado Secretary of State’s Office will post the names of vendors using contractors who knowingly employ illegal aliens to perform work on any public contracts for the state
4	Florida	EO 11-02 EO 11-116	2011 2011	State agencies, contractors, subcontractors	Possible denial of future county projects
5	Georgia	SB 529 HB 2 SB 447 HB 87 HB 742 HB 1027	2006 2009 2010 2011 2012 2012	Public employers, contractors, subcontractors with 500+ employees (phase in)	Failure to comply could result in the suspension or denial of a business license, occupational tax certificate, or other document require to operate a business in the state
6	Idaho	EO 2009-10	2009	State agencies, contractors	Immediate cancellation of the contract, reversion of unspent public funds, and monetary penalties. Every contract by a state agency for a state project or service shall include appropriate civil penalties for violation this executive order
7	Indiana	SB 590	2011	State agencies, contractors	State agencies or political subdivisions may terminate a public contract if the contractor knowingly employs an unauthorized alien
8	Louisiana	HB 342 HB 646 HB 996	2011 2011 2012	State contractors Option for private employers	Failure to complete the affidavit or use E-Verify as required would cause the work to be terminated and bar the contractor from future bidding or contract work for up to three years. HB 646 makes it a state offense to employ unauthorized workers and provides E-Verify as a defense to any charges brought under HB 646
9	Michigan	HB 5365	2012	State agencies, contractors, subcontractors	Employers who do not use E-Verify may have all state contracts terminated and become ineligible for public contracts for three years, and/or may have licenses, permits, or certificates suspended for one year.
10	Mississippi	SB 2988	2008	All employers (phase in)	Employers who do not use E-Verify may have all state contracts terminated and become ineligible for public contracts for three years, and/or may have licenses, permits, or certificates suspended for one year.
11	Missouri	HB 1549 HB 390	2008 2009	Public employers, contractors, subcontractors	A violating company’s business permit and licenses shall be suspended for 14 days. Upon the first violation, the state may terminate contracts and bar the company from doing business with the state for 3 years. Upon second violation, the state may permanently debar the company from doing business with the state.
12	Nebraska	LB 403	2009	Public employers, contractors	Loss of eligibility for state contract work and/or state economic incentives.
13	North Carolina	SB 1523 HB 36	2006 2011	State agencies, universities Localities, all employers (phase in)	Failure to comply with HB 36 can result in civil fines ($10,000+) and notification to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and local law enforcement agencies.
14	Oklahoma	HB 1804	2007	Public employers, contractors, subcontractors	Ineligibility to receive a state contract(s).
15	Pennsylvania	SB 637	2012	Public contractors, subcontractors	First violations incur a warning letter detailing the violation, posted on the website of the Department of General Services of the Commonwealth. On a second violation, the contractor is debarred from public work for 30 days. Upon subsequent violations, the contractor is debarred from public work for 180-365 days. In the case of willful violation, the contractor is debarred from public work for a period of three years. Contractors will also incur a penalty of $250-$1,000 per violation.
16	South Carolina	HB 4400 SB 20 HB 4813	2008 2011 2012	Public employers, contractors (phase in) Private employers Establishes a 24-hour hotline to report E-Verify violations	Possible civil penalty of up to $1,000 per violation and the revocation of the business license.
17	Tennessee	HB 1378	2011	All employers with 6+ employees (phase in)	Employers can incur a penalty of $500 plus an additional $500 for each employee not verified for a first violation; $1,000 plus and additional $1,000 for each employee not verified for a second violation; and $2,500 plus and additional $2,500 for each employee not verified for subsequent violations.
18	Utah	SB 81 SB 39 SB 251 HB 116	2008 2009 2010 2011	Public employers, contractors, subcontractors Private employers with more than 15 employees	Ineligibility to enter into a state contract(s). A private employer may be held civilly liable under state law in a cause of unlawful hiring of an unauthorized alien.
19	Virginia	HB 737 HB 1859 SB 1049	2010 2011	State agencies Public contractors, subcontractors with more than 50 employees	Any employer, including contractors, found to be in violation shall be debarred from entering into a contract with any agency of the Commonwealth for up to one year. The employer shall be released from debarment upon registration and participation in E-Verify. A contractor who fails to enroll and participate in E-Verify may be denied prequalification for contracts.
20	West Virginia	SB 659	2012	Public Employers, contractors	Loss of eligibility for state contract work and/or state economic incentives.

DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano Testifies on E-Verify

On Wednesday, October 26, DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano testified about Department oversight before the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on the Judiciary. Napolitano’s testimony included a discussion E-Verify’s role in DHS’ smart and effective approach to work-site enforcement.

Read the full testimony here.