Wednesday, October 8, 2014

FCRA Compliance: Reviewing Your Disclosure and Authorization Forms

    We would like to stress the importance of carefully reviewing the Disclosure and Authorization forms ("Authorization") that are sent to job applicants prior to obtaining background checks. You should ensure that these Authorizations do not include any indemnification or release provisions. 

    Recently an individual in California filed a class action lawsuit seeking to hold both a prospective employer and the CRA that provided a consumer report to that employer liable for failing to comply with the requirements of Section 604(b)(2) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA).

    The Authorization that the employer used contained language asking applicants to indemnify and release both the CRA and the employer from any claims that may arise from the collection, disclosure or use of the information provided on the Authorization form. Similar release language, sometimes called a hold-harmless clause, has been the subject of many claims against employers. 

    Class action lawsuits alleging violations of the FCRA are on the rise. Therefore, please be certain that the Disclosure and Authorization forms that you provide to job applicants do not include any type of indemnity, release, or hold-harmless language."

Thanks for your attention to this important compliance matter.



Thursday, October 2, 2014

Washington D.C. Ban-the-Box Legislation Set to Take Effect in October



Ban-the-box legislation originally prohibited employers from including the question “have you been convicted of a crime” and its associated check box. This was in an effort to rehabilitate former offenders. The thought process is that without an opportunity to gain employment, many are doomed to become repeat offenders. While recent laws in the same vein are being referred to as ban-the-box laws, this is a bit of a misnomer. The movement towards more regulations on background screening has evolved to include more stipulations than just removing a check box from an application.

The latest to join the recent push for more regulations on background screening is Washington D.C. The bill signed by Mayor Vincent Gray last month will go into effect after a 30-day period of congressional review. It is scheduled to go into effect October 21, 2014. This law, dubbed the Fair Criminal Record Screening Amendment Act of 2014, applies to all D.C. employers with 10 or more employees.

The law states:
  •          Employers may not make any inquiry about an arrest or criminal accusation against the applicant, which is not pending and did not result in a conviction.
  •          An employer must not make any inquiry about an applicant’s criminal history until after making a conditional offer of employment.
  •          A conditional offer can only be rescinded if there is a “legitimate business reason”


Exceptions where inquiry into an applicant’s criminal may precede a conditional offer:
  •          Where any federal or District law or regulation requires the consideration of an applicant’s criminal history for the purposes of employment
  •          Where a position designated by the employer is part of a federal or District government program or obligation that is designed to encourage the employment of those with criminal histories

Penalties for violation:
  •          For employers that employ 11-30 employees, a fine of up to $1,000
  •          For employers that employ 31-99 employees, a fine of up to $2,500
  •          For employers that employ 100 or more employees, a fine of up to $5,000

It is crucial that D.C. employers update their hiring practices no later than October 21st.  Ensure that the application has been reviewed and modified accordingly. Also, make sure that a criminal background check is not performed before a conditional offer has been made. Lastly, the exclusion of an applicant based on criminal conduct must be job related and consistent with business necessity. If you are not sure what that means, refer to this EEOC guidance.


There are now 13 states and around 70 cities and counties in the U.S. that have enacted some form of “Ban-the Box” legislation. We will continue to report new developments so that you may remain informed and in compliance with the local laws that apply to you and your organization. Another good resource for staying up-to-date is www.nelp.org.